Pro Choice v Pro Life

I hesitate to share this. Mostly because of it's content. But, it's very much a part of what is happening...and unfortunately, used in the last election with Obama and Romney. The Pro-choice advocates were trying to say that Mitt Romney wanted to take away a woman's choice because he was Pro-Life...but I wonder how many of them have ever been to one of these clinics or seen exactly what is done. And I wonder how many would continue to push for this agenda after witnessing the "procedure" being performed. This is a highly controversial subject. But we are supposed to be active advocates in our communities. And I'd like to spread factual content knowledge regarding this topic and state that though a woman does have a choice, someone needs to be a 'voice' for the baby who is very much 'alive' inside of her. She cannot disregard the responsibility of her initial 'choice' to engage in intercourse that resulted in a pregnancy...and it's connected consequence. Is there a disjointed view that one can bypass the natural consequence of a choice to have sex? The two are irreparably connected. And the child is not to be dismissed as a footnote. We can be the voice for the child who does not yet have one...but will if given the chance.